Also today I came across a 1954 paper by Baylis in the Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New Zealand 1868-1961 which discusses ploidy in Solanum aviculare (poroporo) and S. laciniatum, and guess what? S. aviculare has exactly the same number of chromosomes as humans (n = 23)!! The other New Zealand Solanum, S. laciniatum, has twice the number of chromosomes as poroporo (n = 46). This ensures their genetic isolation. Apparently most Solanaceae have only 12 chromosomes, so this is an example where polyploidy has already occurred (allopolyploidy). Baylis makes the comment that S. laciniatum pollen is larger, its flowers, seeds and stone-cell masses (in the fruit pulp) are larger, and it has deeper corolla colour than poroporo. So this means that if I were to create a straight doubling of chromosomes using oryzalin, to obtain a tetraploid poroporo, it would probably just resemble S. laciniatum. The two aren't cross-breedable back to a triploid (46 crossed with 23, divided by 2 is an odd number, so no going there). I wonder what the maximum number of chromosomes a plant can have? Is 92 a bit excessive, do you think? What about an octoploid (n=92 crossed back with a triploid n = 46 to obtain a pentaploid n=69?). I'm not sure how this would work....
Some additional reading: "Species of this group in Australia are S. aviculare, S. capsiciforme, S. laciniatum, S. linearifolium, S. simile, S. symonii and S. vescum. The 8th species, S. multivenosum, is found in the highlands of New Guinea.
For a treatment of the group as a whole see D.E.Symon (1994). Kangaroo Apples. Solanum sect. Archaeosolanum. (D.E.Symon: State Herbarium of South Australia)."
Solanum laciniatum |
Hi im a student down in Dunedin. Your blog is great! I'm doing some e-research for a blog post on grafting to Solanum laciniatum. I am growing a few bushes and am a bit chicken to eat the fruit, especialy since the plants were once cultivated to produce contraceptives! Anyway, I was thinking it would be better in the long run to breed more palatable/less toxic laciniatum cultivars than to go through all the trouble of grafting year in and year out. Any idea on how one might go about this? Is palatability a good indicator of toxicity? It's gardeners who develop better food crops out of natives that will provide the best options for the future.
ReplyDeleteWow, thanks very much for your comment. Yes it's totally up to the gardeners to breed this one. Agree, the fruit needs to be bred to be totally non-toxic, even in an unripe state. How we do this? I think if we could select for characteristics such as fruit size and reduced skin-split, one of the side effects of this selection will probably be improved palatability. Worth a shot.
ReplyDelete